Nature Vancouver

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Board of Directors
  • Contact Us
  • Membership
  • Links
  • What's New
  • Donations
  • Scholarship
Main Menu
  • Calendar of Events
  • Evening Programs
  • Field Trips
  • Workshops
  • Birding Section
  • Botany Section
  • Marine Biology Section
  • Geology Section
  • Conservation Section
  • Photography Section
  • Publications
  • Summer Camps
  • Nature Tours
  • Members' Forum
  • Members' Photo Gallery
  • Volunteers
User login
  • Request new password
Not a member yet?
  • Sign Up for User Account
Search
Find us on Facebook

Oil Tanker traffic through Port of Vancouver

PostDateIcon Fri, 2010/05/28 - 4:50pm | PostAuthorIcon Kelly_Sekhon

There is increased Oil Tanker traffic through Port of Vancouver and Second Narrows in particular. The CBC did a recent story on this, which unfortunately was locally pre-empted by a hockey game. The video can be found by following the link in the upper right hand corner of the following web page:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/05/07/bc-vancouver-tankers-oil-spill.html
 
The Port of Vancouver has occasionally exported crude oil surplus to local refinery needs. But with the recent expansion of the Transmountain pipeline it now has steady flows of crude oil available for export in much larger ships. All of these exports occur through the narrow and shallow confines of Second Narrows, and each tanker contains enough crude oil to exceed the spill of the Exxon Valdez by several times. Unlike the Northern Gateway proposal by Enbridge, the expansion of the Kinder Morgan capacity and the tanker traffic it generates apparently does not require the same extensive stakeholder, environmental, and regulatory review that new terminals require.
 
With the entire Gulf of Georgia less than 100 miles in radius from Second Narrows, a spill there or elsewhere enroute to the open Pacific would be disastrous. The Exxon Valdez spill travelled in excess of 400 miles, and the current disaster in the Gulf of Mexico illustrates just how inadequate spill clean up efforts can be even when weather and tides co-operate.
 

Submitted by

Peter Baker
pbakersterATgmail.com
M.Sc. Oceanography
Nature Vancouver Member
North Vancouver

 

‹ Lulu Island Wetland - Update Lulu Island Wetlands - Richmond, BC ›
PostCommentsIcon Login to post comments   | PostTagIcon Tags: Conservation

Sunday July 4 - Story in The Province

Submitted by Kelly_Sekhon on Sun, 2010/07/04 - 2:50pm.

Sunday Province this morning has a two page story on pages A8-9.
 
For those of you who have direct access to computers, the story is on line at:
 
http://www.theprovince.com/news/City+council+look+spill+risks+Burrard+Inlet/3234248/story.html
 
Another story on this, but with a bit different take is from the Globe and Mail:
 
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/why-the-vancouver-mayor-makes-waves-over-oil-tankers/article1627227/
 
For those who like CBC Radio One, I was also on "ON THE COAST" hosted by Stephen Quinn just after 4 p.m. on Friday. Unfortunately that interview does not seem to be on the CBC web site as either an interview or part of a podcast of that show. You just had to be there.
 
Presenting at Vancouver City Council tomorrow in the early afternoon. Hope to see you there.
 
Regards,
 
Peter

  • Login to post comments

Op / Ed article in Prrovice June 17

Submitted by Kelly_Sekhon on Tue, 2010/06/22 - 5:47pm.

Here is a link to Guest Op / Ed page article by Peter Baker:

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Guest+column+Should+bigger+tankers+really+Vancouver/3164946/story.htm
  • Login to post comments

This is HUGE. Do you have a

Submitted by friendlymom (not verified) on Wed, 2010/06/16 - 2:17pm.

This is HUGE. Do you have a plan in place? How do we join forces and stop this?
  • Login to post comments

All photos and text on this website are copyrighted by the original contributors.

The material cannot be reproduced in any medium without the consent of the original contributor.